Finite entropy vs finite energy

  • Eleonora Di Nezza

    École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France, and Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
  • Vincent Guedj

    Université de Toulouse, France
  • Chinh H. Lu

    Université Paris-Saclay, France
Finite entropy vs finite energy cover

A subscription is required to access this article.

Abstract

Probability measures with either finite Monge–Ampère energy or finite entropy have played a central role in recent developments in Kähler geometry. In this note we make a systematic study of quasi-plurisubharmonic potentials whose Monge–Ampère measures have finite entropy. We show that these potentials belong to the finite energy class , where denotes the complex dimension, and provide examples showing that this critical exponent is sharp. Our proof relies on refined Moser–Trudinger inequalities for quasi-plurisubharmonic functions.

Cite this article

Eleonora Di Nezza, Vincent Guedj, Chinh H. Lu, Finite entropy vs finite energy. Comment. Math. Helv. 96 (2021), no. 2, pp. 389–419

DOI 10.4171/CMH/515