Oberwolfach Reports

Full-Text PDF (468 KB) | Introduction as PDF | Metadata | Table of Contents | OWR summary
Volume 9, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 1845–1893
DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2012/30

Published online: 2013-02-20

Classical Algebraic Geometry

Olivier Debarre[1], David Eisenbud[2], Frank-Olaf Schreyer and Ravi Vakil[3]

(1) École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
(2) Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley, USA
(3) Stanford University, United States

Progress in algebraic geometry often comes through the introduction of new tools and ideas to tackle the classical problems the development of the field. Examples include new invariants that capture some aspect of geometry in a novel way, such as the derived category, and the extension of the class of geometric objects considered to allow constructions not previously possible, such as the transition from varieties to schemes or from schemes to stacks. Many famous old problems and outstanding conjectures have been resolved in this way over the last 50 years. While the new theories are sometimes studied for their own sake, they are in the end best understood in the context of the classical questions they illuminate. The goal of the workshop was to study new developments in algebraic geometry, with a view toward their application to the classical problems.

No keywords available for this article.

Debarre Olivier, Eisenbud David, Schreyer Frank-Olaf, Vakil Ravi: Classical Algebraic Geometry. Oberwolfach Rep. 9 (2012), 1845-1893. doi: 10.4171/OWR/2012/30